And here’s a screenshot of my mail account.

Tweeter Greeter.
Humph.
I confess to being puzzled, really. I wasn’t expecting this.
(Sorry to twitter users whose usernames are displayed here - but I figure this information is public anyway via my twitter profile, so… I assume I will be excused. And no, this is not a fake screenshot - erm, really, now, why would I? Also you could check my twitter profile to confirm!)
The website claims that this is the explanation.
A message posted on your twitter will automatically be formated with your unique link. Meaning that when people follow through to this site, they will have to follow you in position 1 to use the system themselves.
Now when those people refer others via their link, their new followers will also follow you in position 2 and so on down 5 levels deep. By the time you reach the 5th position, you will have thousands, if not tens of thousands of new twitter followers… and it NEVER stops growing!
Interesting. I worked out the math and it tallies with his claims in theory. I’m just highly amused that it (seems to) work in practice, even to the extent of giving you followers who would interest you (and your business, presumably, if you are running one).
For those of you who are thinking this an extensive attempt at doing a pitch-in-disguise, please - have mercy, it is not. I am genuinely intrigued, amused, and even pleased. I can’t see why I’ll need a large number of followers at twitter, except that I love meeting/knowing people with whom I can engage in intelligent/entertaining, even if brief, conversation, and I think that’s a lot of fun… and I only want to put my surprise at something like this working on record. Phew!
You can try this for the fun of it if you like: http://tweetergetter.com/avanimisra
(Again, I’m not urging you to do it - but if you are simply curious, it’s worth that click. It claims to resort to “whitehat” techniques, and the only downside I can think of is not everyone who’s following you may be impressed by an automated-looking message.)
PS: It’s worth noting that my skepticism is to do with whether an advertised “system” can actually live up to its usually over-the-top claims (disclaimers and fine print included). I’m not worried, for instance, (at least in this case) about whether I’m cheating by “getting followers” from an automated system, because:
a. I make sure I follow back followers whom I find interesting, which is good for me, since *I* am the one who finds *them* interesting, and,
b. If my followers figure that I’m not worth following, they know how to reverse their (initially automated) decision to follow me.
Although the website may ’smell funny’ because of it’s bold-claims-in-large-fonts style that is bound to put off many (such as myself, as I said in the beginning), it is probably just an interesting (and perhaps even cool/clever) way to find people you’d want to meet anyway, and conversely. In fact, I’m already glad about a couple of interesting people I’ve come across, that I wouldn’t have probably said hello to otherwise. They’ve been nice enough to pingback, too - so, this may even be considered a note of thanks to system.
*Having said all this, I *do* wish people read more of Strunk and White.
I frown when I see “1000s”.
Please, why can’t we say thousands, instead?



